Skip to content
Charity Transparency ProfileTax year 2024

MUTTS TRANSPORT SERVICE

EIN 45-0976781 · CA · General animal shelters and rescues

Verified by bounded review · fast ai · Verified Jul 28, 2026

Summary header

Current result

91

A

Confidence

Low confidence

Coverage state

Automated Limited Rating

Latest form

Form 990

Latest verified tax period

Dec 31, 2024

Filing status checked

Jul 28, 2026

Rating updated

Aug 3, 2026

Filing date

Not published

Peer context

Fallback baseline

Methodology version

ct-v1.3-zero-contribution-revenue

Data source

Published section data

Published rating filing basis

Rating basis tax period: Dec 31, 2024

Currentness: extension window · Eligibility: eligible form 990

Form type verified: Jul 28, 2026

Cash vs. noncash breakdown

The launch methodology keeps the headline contribution number visible, but also shows how much appears to be cash-like support that can more directly anchor donor interpretation.

Total reported contributions

$800

Noncash / in-kind contributions

$0

Estimated cash-like contributions

$800

Explanation panel

Automated scoring time: Less than 1 second

Deterministic methodology rescore from persisted canonical metrics

Information reviewed

    MUTTS TRANSPORT SERVICE's 5 available financial-transparency categories cover 84% of methodology weight. Their normalized total is 91.43, rounded to 91 (A).

    Confidence note: Confidence is low because an apparent filing classification inconsistency required a disclosed deterministic reconciliation.

    Peer-context note: This profile currently uses a fallback baseline, which is disclosed so donors can see when cohort depth is strong and when the model is falling back to a broader baseline.

    Management Burden

    This category scored 100 under ct-v1.3-zero-contribution-revenue.

    A

    100

    Weight 22%

    Executive Compensation Burden

    This category scored 100 under ct-v1.3-zero-contribution-revenue.

    A

    100

    Weight 12%

    Fundraising Efficiency

    This category scored 100 under ct-v1.3-zero-contribution-revenue.

    A

    100

    Weight 16%

    In-Kind Distortion

    This category scored 100 under ct-v1.3-zero-contribution-revenue.

    A

    100

    Weight 16%

    Transparency & Governance

    This category scored 60 under ct-v1.3-zero-contribution-revenue.

    D

    60

    Weight 18%

    Financial Resilience

    This category was unavailable from the current filing and was excluded rather than scored as zero.

    Not scored

    —

    Weight 16%

    Category context and cautions

    • medium severity

      Form 990 classification reconciled

      The core Form 990 and Schedule A report inconsistent contribution classifications. Animal Souls Beacon applied this disclosed scoring adjustment: Reclassified $800 of reported program-service revenue as contributions for scoring, reducing effective program-service revenue from $94,733 to $93,933; total revenue remained $94,733 and the amount was not counted twice.

    Multi-year trend

    The launch view keeps a textual trend table so the pattern stays readable without depending on a chart alone.

    YearOverallCash-like supportMgmt burdenExec burdenIn-kindCoverage
    202491$800100100100Automated Limited Rating

    Source-grounded citations

    These public-record references back the visible identity and financial figures. The public profile stays citation-first rather than narrative-only.

      Within this section

      Use the directory for broader browsing, the compare view for side-by-side context, and the methodology page when you need the scoring rules behind the visible profile.

      Financial transparency first

      This section's launch frame is financial transparency, not a complete impact evaluation. A strong score here does not mean every program outcome question is settled.

      Read methodology

      Cash, in-kind, and labor context

      Not all salaries are overhead, and headline revenue can mislead when noncash support is large. The public profiles keep both cautions visible instead of collapsing them into one blunt ratio.

      Compare charities