Public support
A shared section shell for support requests, project expectations, donations, and transparency disclosures.
Support / Donate
Requests, Corrections & Suggestions
Submit corrections, clarification requests, missing information, accessibility concerns, safety concerns, and thoughtful suggestions through a structured review process.
Request philosophy
Animal Souls Beacon welcomes corrections, clarifications, missing information, accessibility issues, and thoughtful suggestions.
Every request is reviewed, but not every request can be accepted, published, or implemented. Decisions are based on mission alignment, source quality, animal welfare relevance, public value, safety, privacy, legal considerations, technical feasibility, and available capacity.
When we cannot act on a request, that does not mean the request lacks value. It may mean the request is outside the current scope of the project, cannot be verified, requires more sources, presents safety or legal concerns, or would require resources we do not currently have.
Request types
Correction request
Use when something on the site appears inaccurate, outdated, or misidentified.
Clarification request
Use when content needs more context, explanation, or clearer framing.
Missing information request
Use when a bill, organization, facility, jurisdiction, case, or issue is not yet represented.
Feature suggestion
Use when proposing a new tool, workflow, page, view, alert, or filter.
Accessibility or usability issue
Use for reading, navigation, mobile, screen-reader, contrast, keyboard, or form usability concerns.
Privacy, safety, or legal concern
Use for privacy risk, retaliation risk, misidentification, harassment, safety, or legal concerns. These receive elevated review.
Partnership, media, or volunteer inquiry
Use for collaboration, press, research, volunteer, or organizational outreach.
Other
Use when none of the other request types accurately fits your submission.
Evaluation criteria
- Mission alignment
- Source quality
- Animal welfare relevance
- Public value
- Safety and privacy
- Legal risk
- Editorial independence
- Technical feasibility
- Available capacity
- Relationship to existing roadmap or active work
Respectful status language
Requests are reviewed carefully. If status wording is shown or echoed in public response notes, it should stay respectful and non-dismissive.
Submit a support request
Use this form for corrections, requests, accessibility issues, privacy or safety concerns, and related inquiries. Unsupported file uploads are intentionally not enabled in this release.